Thanks graff. Appreciate the help. However, (and I should have explained this in my earlier post itself) I am deliberately trying to parse one XML line after another rather than the whole xml file at once. The reason was to find if there are any mismatched tags and then replace the tags and do other corrections. I am still stumped at the ability of XML parser to detect badly-formed XML in spite of the fact that I am not parsing the whole file at once. My assumption is that since I am parsing line by line, XML::Parser has no knowledge of the what is coming next and therefore, it should not be able to detect a badly formed XML. The fact that it does is indeed fantastic albeit completely confounding. | [reply] |
If you are trying "to find if there are any mismatched tags", that sounds like you are looking for errors that would cause an XML parser to fail (and it appears that the sample xml data you posted has this kind of problem, so I understand your goal now).
But what that really means is that you can't really use an XML parser at all to solve this problem. As pointed out above, it's easy enough to check for xml errors using xmllint, although the error reports you get can sometimes be difficult to interpret, and the actual problem can still be hard to spot.
I would be inclined to use a regex-based diagnosis - something like this:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $infile = shift; # get input file name from @ARGV
open( my $fh, "<:utf8", $infile ) or die $!;
local $/; # slurp the whole file in the next line
$_ = <$fh>;
s/^<\?.*>\s+//; # ditch the "<?xml...?>" line, if any
my %open_tags;
my %close_tags;
for my $tkn (split/(?<=>)|(?=<)/) { # split on look-behind | look-ahe
+ad for brackets
if ( $tkn =~ m{^<(\/?)(\w+)} ) {
if ( $1 eq '' ) {
$open_tags{$2}++;
}
else {
$close_tags{$2}++;
}
}
}
for my $tag ( sort keys %open_tags ) {
if ( ! exists( $close_tags{$tag} )) {
warn sprintf( "%s: open tag %s is never closed in %d occurrenc
+e(s)\n",
$infile, $tag, $open_tags{$tag} );
}
else {
if ( $close_tags{$tag} != $open_tags{$tag} ) {
warn sprintf( "%s: element %s has %d open tags but %d clos
+e tag(s)\n",
$infile, $tag, $open_tags{$tag}, $close_tags
+{$tag} );
}
delete $close_tags{$tag};
}
}
for my $tag ( keys %close_tags ) {
warn sprintf( "%s: close tag %s has no open tags in %d occurrence(
+s)\n",
$infile, $tag, $close_tags{$tag} );
}
That will at least give you a clear tally of imbalances (if any) in the open/close tag inventory for a given xml file. You should be able to use this information, together with the line numbers from the xmllint reports, to locate the problems.
So, when you find these mismatched tags, isn't the next step to look at the process that is creating the xml files, and fix that? (These xml files aren't being created by manual editing, are they??)
(Update: BTW, I forgot to mention... this new information in your reply makes your OP even more egregiously obtuse. If you had said at the beginning, "I have this xml file that has an error in the tags, and I need to figure out how to find the problem," then the discussion would have been more effective. I know, you already feel bad about the OP, and I shouldn't pile it on, but it needs to be said.) | [reply] [d/l] |
Thanks graff. You have been great help. Yes, you are right about stressing on the point about OP and point is well taken. I understand your solution. But, what still confounds me completely is how the XML::Parser is able to detect the badly formed XML file even if the program is parsing one line at a time. This obviously could be because my understanding of the XML::Parser is limited.
One of the unintended consequences that your reply had gave me an insight into a problem that I had earlier, but never got around asking the permonks site. Aren't unintended consequences great when they turn out to be good? Thanks macho again!
| [reply] |