in reply to Re: Sheer idle curiousity . . .
in thread Sheer idle curiousity . . .
That CPUs have differences in performance, and so do Perl versions?
# This is perl, v5.10.1 (*) built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi # negative Rate d c e a b d 1219274/s -- -7% -15% -20% -31% c 1315339/s 8% -- -9% -13% -26% e 1441482/s 18% 10% -- -5% -19% a 1519028/s 25% 15% 5% -- -15% b 1778883/s 46% 35% 23% 17% -- # positive Rate d e c a b d 1300194/s -- -3% -6% -13% -13% e 1336169/s 3% -- -3% -10% -10% c 1375954/s 6% 3% -- -7% -8% a 1486080/s 14% 11% 8% -- -0% b 1492276/s 15% 12% 8% 0% --
The winner here is, quite unexpectedly, B.
Another cpu, also on Perl 5.10.1 but amd64, says B is 80% faster than the worst contender (E) when negative; and A is 51% faster than E (B having the second place at 42% faster) when positive.
Third cpu with Perl 5.14.4 gives a negligible win for E -- D being the low anchor. So I think we can conclude that the Perl version matters the most?
|
|---|