in reply to same script, different results

Hello jb60606,

When I run your code on my 32-bit Vista system:

This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 1 (v5.18.1) built for MSWin32-x +86-multi-thread-64int

I get the same results as you. Looking through the code, nothing leaps out as a potential trigger for different behaviour on a different system. (Did you ask the interviewer for details of the system on which he ran your code?) So I can’t help you there, sorry. But the following points should be noted:

Hope that helps,

Athanasius <°(((><contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: same script, different results
by jb60606 (Acolyte) on Oct 25, 2013 at 13:42 UTC
    Hi folks, thanks for your expertise and advice. To answer some of your questions, I hadn't originally planned on writing it this way as I thought something like a hash of arrays would have been more appropriate. The problem was that a HoA is kind of uncharted territory for me, as I am still relatively new to this this or any language. Additionally, I only had the remainder of the day to put a script together and send it back to the interviewer. The interview was yesterday. I had hoped to figure out what went wrong and package an explanation with the thank-you letter today but seeing that you've discovered additional unforgivable problems, I might be better off leaving it alone. Besides, apart from the 2nd script being a success, I pretty much bombed the rest of the interview after learning that this script failed and highly doubt they consider me a competitive candidate.