in reply to RFC: Term::ReadKey Availability and requiring it in Term::ReadLine::Perl5
I don't see any issue with requiring Term::ReaddKey -- simply document that requirement and that if the user doesn't want to install it, they can go with Term::ReadLine::Perl.
Separate question - have you tested your code against Term::ReadLine::Event? :)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Term::ReadLine::Perl5 and Term::ReadLine::Event (Was Re^2: RFC: Term::ReadKey Availability and requiring it in Term::ReadLine::Perl5)
by rockyb (Scribe) on Dec 03, 2013 at 22:07 UTC | |
by Tanktalus (Canon) on Dec 04, 2013 at 18:39 UTC | |
by rockyb (Scribe) on Dec 04, 2013 at 23:37 UTC |