in reply to Whatever happened to Win32::IE::Mechanize?

The modules, unless otherwise assigned, are copyright the owners. The way cpan is run, the owner of the module is able to remove the files from cpan (when, in theory, they will be pulled to backpan).

I've emailed Abe Timmerman, because I wouldn't mind adopting the module, but to no avail.

Please describe what you mean by 'but to no avail'. I don't see a reason why the module could not be adopted (assuming that there is no show stopper in the copyright). There is even an adoption procedure on CPAN.

--MidLifeXis

  • Comment on Re: Whatever happened to Win32::IE::Mechanize?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Whatever happened to Win32::IE::Mechanize?
by Michael Roberts (Sexton) on Nov 06, 2013 at 14:05 UTC
    "To no avail," in this case, means that he has not yet replied. I know there's an adoption procedure; I've used it before (Iterator::Simple, when Perl 5.12 broke it) - contacting the author is the first step.

    What I'm wondering is whether the community knows anything about Abe's reasons for dropping the module beyond the obvious, which is that he no longer uses it and wasn't maintaining it. Because I can totally understand that, but if there was some reason beyond "I haven't looked at this for 8 years and it's time to clean up my life" it would be nice to know it before I really start getting my hands dirty with the code.

    Of course, it's too late. I'm already looking at it and feeling certain parental urges, and I know those signs. It's like a puppy dog, just begging for attention, and it's just the size module I like - not too big or hairy, but truly useful.

    My sister takes in cats; I seem to be starting to take in CPAN modules.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom