Re^2: Aside from CPAN, has anybody used Labyrinth?

"Update, didn't notice before: PASS (8), FAIL (159). Which due to its specific usage isn't really surprising but certainly a measure of how "portable" it is."

YIKES! I didnt notice that either.
That synches it, for sure.

Thanks for the update, Your Mother

--Chris

#!/usr/bin/perl -Tw
use Perl::Always or die;
my $perl_version = (5.12.5);
print $perl_version;

Comment on Re^2: Aside from CPAN, has anybody used Labyrinth?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Aside from CPAN, has anybody used Labyrinth? by hippo (Archbishop) on Nov 20, 2013 at 23:23 UTC
The "PASS (8), FAIL (159)" seems to be an older version. 5.18, the newest version has PASS (418) at the time of writing. Also, since it was only released last month it is good to see that it is being actively maintained.	[reply]
Re^4: Aside from CPAN, has anybody used Labyrinth? by taint (Chaplain) on Nov 21, 2013 at 01:24 UTC
Greetings, hippo. That looks a little better. :) --Chris #!/usr/bin/perl -Tw use Perl::Always or die; my $perl_version = (5.12.5); print $perl_version;	[reply]