That sounds better to my layman eyes, yes :)
| [reply] |
Ralesk,
I'm glad you approve! :-)
Now that we've cleared that up, will you please make a pledge?
Thank you in advance.
Perling,
~ Will
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
ysth, can you please provide your suggested wording so I can see what you mean, exactly?
| [reply] |
Abbreviating a license is very error prone. I would recommend you say less rather than more. What you do say makes me think you are only thinking of the GPL, not the Artistic license. You can modify and distribute RPerl without providing source code for your modifications, for instance, so long as you adhere to paragraphs 3c and 4c. You can even sell it, if aggregated as specified in paragraph 5.
--
A math joke: r = | |csc(θ)|+|sec(θ)| |-| |csc(θ)|-|sec(θ)| |
| [reply] |
That is not what I would consider a reasonable summary of the options available under the Artistic license,.... ysth, come on now , sure it is
| [reply] |