in reply to Re^3: POD translation to HTML bug? (pod2html)
in thread POD translation to HTML bug?
No offence was intended. It was kind of conclusion/closing of the thread.
However, you puzzled me with the non-reproduced behaviour. Consequently, I wrote a small sample case:
=pod =over =item Sample paragraph =item Non-empty Second sample =back =cut 1;
Empty lines suppressed to make it smaller.
I then run pod2html --infile=podbug.pm --outfile=podbug.html and the result is:
<?xml version="1.0" ?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w +3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>podbug.pm</title> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <link rev="made" href="mailto:root@localhost" /> </head> <body style="background-color: white"> <!-- INDEX BEGIN --> <div name="index"> <p><a name="__index__"></a></p> </div> <!-- INDEX END --> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p>Sample paragraph</p> </dd> <dt><strong><a name="non_empty" class="item">Non-empty</a></strong></d +t> <dd> <p>Second sample</p> </dd> </dl> </body> </html>
From this output:
Version information
I don't know into which package pod2html is stored. My present Perl installation is v5.14.4 (should be upgraded within a month). I found Pod::Simple::HTML in the library and it claims version 3.16.
I'm no Perl guru, but from a quick look to this package, I doubt it is used by pod2html because the DOCTYPE in it is for HTML 4.01 Transitional
Regards
PS: If you need more version information, tell me how to find it.
PPS: It would be nicer to attach the test files but I don't know how to do it.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: POD translation to HTML bug? (pod2html Pod::Html 1.11)
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 07, 2013 at 23:19 UTC |