in reply to Re^7: sort +*, @array
in thread sort +*, @array
Please carefully read the latter half of my response to BrowserUK's example to see its correspondence to ST.
You mean the bit that doesn't use +* and claim it is an ST. THERE IS NO POINT!
My example was never a challenge to what P6 sort was capable of, I've written my own key-caching front end to the Crt qsort on more than one occasion. It's not hard.
It was a challenge to your patently absurd claim. And the damage such claims can have.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^9: sort +*, @array
by raiph (Deacon) on Dec 14, 2013 at 17:25 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 15, 2013 at 00:04 UTC | |
by raiph (Deacon) on Dec 15, 2013 at 04:47 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 15, 2013 at 08:07 UTC |