Re^5: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)

in reply to Re^4: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)
in thread Travelling problem

And what have you "proven" so far except dropping numbers and (most probably) miscalculating the lower bound?

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

Comment on Re^5: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?) by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 23, 2013 at 17:17 UTC
except dropping numbers Check it yourself: `86850 [ 0 5 13 22 8 3 12 20 16 11 6 1 10 15 7 18 2 19 17 14 4 9 21 23 +]` [download] With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Travelling problem (Anyone better 86850?) by tangent (Parson) on Dec 23, 2013 at 17:43 UTC
Or even: `85923 [1,2,11,16,7,8,12,17,21,6,13,4,9,23,14,10,22,15,5,18,20,3,19,24]` [download]	[reply] [d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom