Re: RFC: Syntax::Construct

"The Problem"

Sorry bros - but i really don't know where the problem is.

I swear that i will use...

karls-mac-mini:monks karl$ !!
perl -e 'print qq("What the fuck is say good for?"\n);'
"What the fuck is say good for?"
[download]

... until the day i die.

Thanx for any advice (if i miss something), Karl

Update: This ~~was~~ is a serious question...

«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

Comment on Re: RFC: Syntax::Construct Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Syntax::Construct by choroba (Cardinal) on Dec 25, 2013 at 18:55 UTC
Are you avoiding all the other features or constructs, as `//`, `current_sub`, `unicode_strings`, `/r` or `/p` or `\K` in regexes? If so, the module does not offer anything to you. لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: RFC: Syntax::Construct by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Dec 25, 2013 at 19:16 UTC
Thank you very much choroba for your explanation. Sometimes i sink before i type. Didn't i mention this already ;-( My best regards, Karl «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»	[reply]