in reply to Inconsistency of 'Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment' warning
I will attempt to clarify my previous answer, given questions sent to me offline.
The question is: Why perl generates 'Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment' only for the second call of foo and not for the both calls? What's the difference?
The first call specifies a key. The value is undefined, but the key is not.
The second one has an undefined key.
Hopefully this code will demonstrate the difference -- the only error generated is when the key is undefined. The value has nothing to do with the problem.
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my %bar = (); $bar{not_existing} = 1; $bar{"is_existing"} = 1; my $bar1 = $bar{not_existing}; my $bar2 = $bar{"is_existing"}; my $bar3 = $bar{really_not_existing}; my $key4 = "value_not_existing"; my $bar4 = $bar{$key4}; my $key5; my $bar5 = $bar{$key5}; exit; __END__ C:\Steve\devcvs\mapgen>\steve\t\t2.pl Use of uninitialized value $key5 in hash element at C:\steve\t\t2.pl l +ine 19.
|
|---|