Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

Tying a session to an IP would be about the only reasonable solution,

um, tying a session to a browser would be reasonable enough ... an ip can be well shared

and even then, only for the CB

anonymous monk doesn't have access to CB

...

um, think of it as an automatic signature ... something to help you besides writing style ... oh, i'm responding to that shadowy figure in balcony seat 11E

Comment on Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter by taint (Chaplain) on Jan 03, 2014 at 10:35 UTC
Thank you for making my point. In the end, I think the tools PM already provides -- especially "peer review", do as good a job as anyone can hope for, and IMHO, a damn good job, at that. Have a nice day. :) --Chris Ąλɐp ʇɑəɹ⅁ ɐ əʌɐɥ puɐ ʻꜱdləɥ ꜱᴉɥʇ ədoH	[reply]
Re^4: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 13:23 UTC
Thank you for making my point. In the end, I think the tools PM already provides -- especially "peer review", do as good a job as anyone can hope for, and IMHO, a damn good job, at that. Have a nice day. :) How did I make your point? What does your point have to do with the proposal? How does "peer review" distinguish anonymous in a thread?	[reply]