in reply to Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

And while you're at it, can you add functionality to prevent LanX to reply to BrowserUk's posts and vice versa, including anonymized posts of the two of them?

  • Comment on Re: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 03, 2014 at 14:00 UTC
    upvoted! =)

    Cheers Rolf

    ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

[reply]
Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by marto (Cardinal) on Jan 03, 2014 at 14:29 UTC

    For those who may be intestested: hide posts from users Re: Blocking users, ignore in the CB /ignore UserNameHere.

    Update: Oh, thanks to LanX for providing me with the link to Re: Blocking users (I forgot where it was) and for prompting me to credit them for this :P

[reply]
[d/l]
Re^2: Assigning unique identifiers within a discussion thread to each distinct anonymous commenter
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 03, 2014 at 14:13 UTC

    Easily implemented: there I've done my half of the job.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion