Re^7: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite

I got 1.41_03 installed using

Previously I said I think recompile with perl Makefile.PL DEFINE=-DSQLITE_ENABLE_FTS4_UNICODE61 and give it a shot , so using the way you did doesn't magically give Makefile.PL thos extra arguments, so I'm not surprised nothing changed for you

Comment on Re^7: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite by elef (Friar) on Jan 08, 2014 at 10:13 UTC
Well, if you read back your post you'll see that it wasn't clear at all, which is why I asked if it works out of the box in 1.41_03. By 'out of the box' I meant 'out of the box'. It wouldn't have been that surprising as 1.41_03 has a newer version of sqlite than 1.40 (3.8.x as opposed to 3.7.x).	[reply]
Re^9: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite by Anonymous Monk on Jan 08, 2014 at 10:42 UTC
Well, if you read back your post you'll see that it wasn't clear at all, which is why I asked if it works out of the box in Well, it seems clear enough to me in Re: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite where I said you need -DEFINES When you asked if it works out of the box in Re^4: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite, I didn't answer the question at all ( Re^5: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite ), I basically said figure it out by reading what I said and trying stuff but I did answer to walto ( Re^4: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite), basically no it doesn't work out of the box because it requires -DEFINES Both answer also seem clear enough to me, maybe a bit short and non-repetitive ... what can I say I'm not chatty	[reply]