Re: Practical Proc::Daemon example

I like Daemon::Control a lot. If you were using it, none of the above code would be needed (i.e. it takes care of start/stop/status, pid files, init scripts etc). I've even used it to daemonise Java and Python programs.

Comment on Re: Practical Proc::Daemon example

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Practical Proc::Daemon example by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Oct 26, 2015 at 16:36 UTC
Most of the OP code is not necessary with Proc::Daemon either. I see very little difference between the utility, options, and syntactic verbosity of the two packages; only the init stuff seems an exception.	[reply]
Re^3: Practical Proc::Daemon example by Arunbear (Prior) on Oct 26, 2015 at 17:39 UTC
Could you show an example? E.g. what would the example in Re^2: Practical Proc::Daemon example look like if Proc::Daemon were used?	[reply]