in reply to Re^2: Argument "" Isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)
in thread Argument "" Isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)

While I don't disagree with you, I think we could guess at the data structure and missing code until the cows come home and still get it wrong.

My intent was really just meant to provide an idea of how the task might be tackled:

"Here's a technique ... you can probably modify it ..."

[I also note that it's more than a day and half since the OP was posted and, despite a number of replies raising issues with it, ler224 has provided no clarification whatsoever.]

-- Ken

  • Comment on Re^3: Argument "" Isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Argument "" Isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)
by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Feb 11, 2014 at 12:15 UTC

    I also saw that the only reply by ler224 was to CountZero's first reply and only very shortly after the timestamp of the OP — and it did not address the pertinent part of the Count's suggestion! Not the sort of engagement one hopes to see.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom