Re^2: How can I write this in a "simpler" way?

It still uses the <> operator, with STDIN as the operand.

لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ

Comment on Re^2: How can I write this in a "simpler" way? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: How can I write this in a "simpler" way? by Anonymous Monk on Feb 12, 2014 at 00:07 UTC
Yeah, his "problem" is not to use the <> like the general way, <STDIN> is acceptable.	[reply]