Re: Development environment

I have found that one Linux distribution still has some sanity, maintaining the original linux concepts and ideals.... it's called Slackware. |||||||||| <- multi-layered blast proof doors :-)

I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth.
Old Perl Programmer Haiku ................... flash japh

Comment on Re: Development environment

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Development environment by ww (Archbishop) on Feb 13, 2014 at 21:40 UTC
No fault with chosing slackware... BUT, the ++ is for the blast doors! Come, let us reason together: Spirit of the Monastery If you didn't program your executable by toggling in binary, it wasn't really programming!	[reply]
Re^2: Development environment by jellisii2 (Hermit) on Feb 14, 2014 at 12:59 UTC
As someone who cut their teeth on Slackware, ++. Of course, I use Ubunty LTS for production now...	[reply]
Re^3: Development environment by zentara (Cardinal) on Feb 14, 2014 at 13:03 UTC
Yeah, me too. I got Slackware 1.0, way back when. It came with an "experimental" X server, which you had to labourously manually configure, but it did have a solid PPP connection and text mode consoles. :-) As I recall, it was still the era of Windows 3.0, and even by then, I knew there had to be something better. :-) I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. Old Perl Programmer Haiku ................... flash japh	[reply]