Re: Errors building XML::LibXML

That number of Bad plan errors usually suggests a too old version of Test::More. However, the XML::LibXML test suite doesn't seem to use any of the newer Test::More features, so that seems unlikely.

Running prove -b t/41xinclude.t in the build dir may give you some better clues.

use Moops; class Cow :rw { has name => (default => 'Ermintrude') }; say Cow->new->name

Comment on Re: Errors building XML::LibXML Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Errors building XML::LibXML (bad plan) by tye (Sage) on Feb 25, 2014 at 15:46 UTC
No, "bad plan" (for a verified test script) usually just means that the test script died (probably with an informative error message in the process, but `prove` likes to hide such things from you). The error message was likely "segmentation violation", as that is what signal 11 is (at least on one system I checked). - tye	[reply]
Re^2: Errors building XML::LibXML by atreyu (Sexton) on Feb 25, 2014 at 17:11 UTC
Thanks for the suggestion...but it appears that tye has it right on this. In desperation, I tried updating to the latest Test::More (that is, Test::Simple, 1.001002) but I still got the same errors running "make test" on XML::LibXML.	[reply]