Re: Re (tilly) 2: How do you wait for a process to end ?

Interesting... I have never heard that, nor had that problem. Is it that way on all *nixes, or just on OSes with weird/broken signals?

Comment on Re: Re (tilly) 2: How do you wait for a process to end ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re (tilly) 4: How do you wait for a process to end ? by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 24, 2001 at 23:23 UTC
The problem is with Perl itself. IIRC there are two problems. The first is that if you receive a signal from within a signal handler, you are likely to dump core. The second is that if Perl allocates memory within a signal handler (which it might do for a lot of reaons), you are likely to dump core. The result is that if you are using signal handlers, doing complex things in your handlers, and receiving a large number of signals, you are aperiodically going to dump core. But note that I have heard rumor that Perl 5.8 is likely to fix this. (The problem with learning about the bugs is that they keep on going away...grumble...:-)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re (tilly) 4: How do you wait for a process to end ?
by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 24, 2001 at 23:23 UTC

IIRC there are two problems. The first is that if you receive a signal from within a signal handler, you are likely to dump core. The second is that if Perl allocates memory within a signal handler (which it might do for a lot of reaons), you are likely to dump core. The result is that if you are using signal handlers, doing complex things in your handlers, and receiving a large number of signals, you are aperiodically going to dump core.

But note that I have heard rumor that Perl 5.8 is likely to fix this. (The problem with learning about the bugs is that they keep on going away...grumble...:-)

[reply]