Re: coding technology

It's great to be typing code in one place and seeing something react accordingly in another place.

Yeah, is great, the name of this place is perlmonks.org... but you aren't typing code at all ;-)

Comment on Re: coding technology

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: coding technology by SteveEirium (Initiate) on Mar 10, 2014 at 04:49 UTC
Yeah just trying to get in at the right point... I posted the rest of this further into a subthread and it got hidden from view, which is what I'm talking about... Cool that farabi thing looks like a good code-muncher, I'll just build some more gear around it for playing with my mind better. Thing is to invent something... You have limited time and resources and can't afford to delve too much. Devel things look like they get pretty deep into somewheres and create more confusion in the process. A fresher more diverse stream of test/whatever information closer to the plan of what I want to do would be better. I am judging the cover of these things anyway. Is that how it should be? I wish I could see footprints and footnotes of other developer's experience in the cyberscapes of the thing. For example, what do most people spend most of their time doing with this thing, like the Synopsis of a module. What do most people have to do to get it working if x, like googling for a way through your broken situation. You can sorta use git to look at what's been happening on a codebase. Anyway all these things and more... Cheers! PS, how can people find the edge of our technological progress?	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: coding technology
by SteveEirium (Initiate) on Mar 10, 2014 at 04:49 UTC

Yeah just trying to get in at the right point... I posted the rest of this further into a subthread and it got hidden from view, which is what I'm talking about... Cool that farabi thing looks like a good code-muncher, I'll just build some more gear around it for playing with my mind better. Thing is to invent something... You have limited time and resources and can't afford to delve too much. Devel things look like they get pretty deep into somewheres and create more confusion in the process. A fresher more diverse stream of test/whatever information closer to the plan of what I want to do would be better. I am judging the cover of these things anyway. Is that how it should be? I wish I could see footprints and footnotes of other developer's experience in the cyberscapes of the thing. For example, what do most people spend most of their time doing with this thing, like the Synopsis of a module. What do most people have to do to get it working if x, like googling for a way through your broken situation. You can sorta use git to look at what's been happening on a codebase. Anyway all these things and more... Cheers! PS, how can people find the edge of our technological progress?

[reply]