Re^10: Misreading m// documentation (perlop =~ )

So you thought repeating yourself would help!? Anyway, you seem to have forgotten to explain what you meant.

If you have a question, go ahead and ask

Comment on Re^10: Misreading m// documentation (perlop =~ )

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Misreading m// documentation (perlop =~ ) by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 31, 2014 at 16:11 UTC
When someone tells you they don't understand what you've just told them, it's a request for clarification. That request has already been made, but here it is again: What did you mean by this?	[reply]
Re^12: Misreading m// documentation (perlop =~ ) by Anonymous Monk on Mar 31, 2014 at 22:40 UTC
When someone tells you they don't understand what you've just told them, it's a request for clarification. Sure its not -- an actual request is an actual request That request has already been made, but here it is again: What did you mean by this? Pretty much the same thing , I don't see the point of this	[reply]