When I typed into the Google search bar, "rpm Path::Tiny", the first link was rpm.pbone.net, which had a link high on the page leading here: Path::Tiny RPM's for various platforms.
Is that what you were looking for? I guess RedHat isn't specifically metioned. Do any of those RPM's work anyway?
If not, can you install using the traditional CPAN installers such as cpan install Path::Tiny?
When I modify my search terms to be more specific, using "rpm Path::Tiny redhat", I get this: Path::Tiny for RHEL6 as the very first search result.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
| [reply] |
I have had great success using cpanspec, it's in fedora and epel so is sometimes easy to get on boxes in more restrictive environments.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1525 | [reply] |
Since cpan2rpm and cpanspec came up, I'll toss in a suggestion too.
Last year, I had to come up with a bunch of RPMs for a bunch of perl modules, and I didn't like either of these for a couple reasons:
cpan2rpm is old, very little active support, doesn't work with modules that only use Module::Build, and in order to gain information about the module, it reads in the Makefile.PL, modifies it and execs it which is (at best) error prone.
cpanspec assumes redhat conventions (though it would be easy to modify to remove those assumptions), and it relies on Makefile.PL or Build.PL being a very standard format as it parses them to get information about the module.
I wanted something which would work for both redhat and OpenSuSE and would not rely on any assumptions about the form of the Makefile.PL or Build.PL, so I wrote cpantorpm. I used it to generate some 300+ module RPMs. I still consider it a bit rough around the edges, but it works, and will allow you to create RPMs that will install in any path you want.
It's on cpan if you want to give it a try.
| [reply] |