in reply to Reminder for timely node approval

I replied to a node the other day without OKing it. I didn't OK it because I didn't want to make that decision on my own because I wasn't sure about the node and didn't want to irritate other monks. I posted a quick reply and left it for someone else to decide whether or not the node should be approved.

Ordinarily, I would have asked people in the CB. But when I checked later, someone had approved it so I didn't bother.It's possible though that it was approved because I replied..

On the whole, we need to remember to approve nodes and if we're not sure, seek council with other monks in the CB.

Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Reminder for timely node approval
by little (Curate) on Aug 29, 2001 at 14:12 UTC
    There have to be more than one user saying OK to a node. A node gets not approved just because one said it would be ok, ast least that is how I understood, cause nodes didn't show up on newest nodes, when I selected Ok, but rather a tiem later, so that indicated to me, that it might need a few votes for OK :-)

    Have a nice day
    All decision is left to your taste
[reply]
      I am not sure. This node seems to suggest otherwise.

      Also, quite a few nodes that end up in Nodes to Consider have the comment "Who approved this?". Of course "who" doesn't necessarily mean one "who".

      Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue.
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion