in reply to Re^6: Is this absurd, or have I not RTFM?
in thread Is this absurd, or have I not RTFM?
Anyway, it looks to me that the cached $$ bug is affecting you. DESTROY is being called on the child process but $$ returns the parent PID.
Something that is clear is that the process receives a SIGTERM while on the middle of the DESTROY call. That explains why an END DESTROY is missing.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^8: Is this absurd, or have I not RTFM?
by petermogensen (Sexton) on May 19, 2014 at 09:24 UTC |