in reply to Re^2: LWP is there any way to get "real" outgoing headers?
in thread LWP is there any way to get "real" outgoing headers?

Oh. I deffinately read the question. I also took the time to read the link you cited in your OP. The question I now have is; What's your question?

If I understood what was being attempted here, was that you're looking to make the HTTP (0.9|1.0|1.1) HEAD request. (RFC2616 && RFC2616 HTTP-1.0)

It also appears that you need to send a specialized UA response?

I know I can easily prepare a complete script in response to your question, in these regards. But I grow weary of attempting to provide you a solution. Only to be told I didn't even bother to read your OP.
Insults are not the best way to solicit help from anyone -- anywhere.

l8r

--Chris

¡λɐp ʇɑəɹ⅁ ɐ əʌɐɥ puɐ ʻꜱdləɥ ꜱᴉɥʇ ədoH

  • Comment on Re^3: LWP is there any way to get "real" outgoing headers?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: LWP is there any way to get "real" outgoing headers?
by Anonymous Monk on May 24, 2014 at 13:22 UTC

    First - I wasn't trying to insult you. Since you answered on different question, I assumed you either didn't read my question or didn't understand it (same did 3 three others, but they later correct their reply, maybe this due my terrible English). Nothing more.

    I'll quote my original question:
    "I'm looking for a way to get "real" outgoing headers, generated by LWP (I need them for logging/debugging purpose)."
    "Real" - means headers, which LWP sent out, not which it return to me.

    > If I understood what was being attempted here, was that you're looking to make the HTTP (0.9|1.0|1.1) HEAD request. (RFC2616 && RFC2616 HTTP-1.0)

    Nope. Since you read my question, it's more than clear - my example script sending HTTP 1.1 requests.
    That's visible both from code, where I forced it to use HTTP 1.1 (and actually that was overkill, since it use it by default for over decade):
    PeerHTTPVersion => "1.1"

    And from sniffer logs:

    GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com

    I posted more detailed reply below, where you told - my question make no sense.