in reply to Re: Perl 5.20.0
in thread Perl 5.20.0

Regarding better UTF-8, I don't think you're reading it the same way I am. Perl has long had the best Unicode support of any of the high level languages. The only changes I saw were an update to the current spec, which is to be expected and has been the norm, and some locale fixes which are welcome but locale is probably still a big global space mess everyone can avoid in code with proper encoding/decoding layers.

So it hasn't been improved exactly. And it's as difficult, unfortunately, as it needs to be.

I only mention this because a lot of the complaints I hear about an admittedly painful part of hacking seem to slight Perl. Perl is a shining handhold in a sea of muck WRT Unicode handling. It's not easy but it is in no way Perl's fault.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl 5.20.0
by taint (Chaplain) on May 27, 2014 at 21:23 UTC
    Thanks for the clarification, Your Mother.

    But please do note; I never intended to insinuate that Perl performed poorly, in any way, where UTF-8 was concerned. Only, that anything that might make the production of GOOD UTF-8, any easier, or more efficient. Was welcomed news. :)

    Thanks again.

    --Chris

    ¡λɐp ʇɑəɹ⅁ ɐ əʌɐɥ puɐ ʻꜱdləɥ ꜱᴉɥʇ ədoH