in reply to char. VS char.

Do you mean something like ROT 13? something a little more generic than what has been suggsted before?

Update: added the rest of the question
gonna lose my voting privs over this one!
:)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: char. VS char.
by blakem (Monsignor) on Aug 30, 2001 at 09:43 UTC
    What, not good enough? Fine, I can golf a mean "double ROT 13", then...

    -Blake

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom