in reply to Re: no visibility to global hashref ?!?
in thread no visibility to global hashref ?!?

Ooof. replace "measureHashrefLength" with "measureFieldLength" in my explanation. And the source for measureFieldLength is $allActivity_hashref and the target is $allActivity_fieldLength_hashref. If one were to look in the sub measureFieldLength one could see it's reading rows from $allActivity_hashref and populating $allActivity_fieldLength_hashref. HTH, kerchunk

  • Comment on Re^2: no visibility to global hashref ?!?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: no visibility to global hashref ?!?
by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Jul 20, 2014 at 08:51 UTC

    So... How does it fail to be visible?

    Update: If 'it' is meant to be  $allActivity_fieldLength_hashref I think Laurent_R has put his finger on the problem below.

Re^3: no visibility to global hashref ?!?
by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Jul 20, 2014 at 18:56 UTC
    Ooof. replace "measureHashrefLength" with "measureFieldLength" in my explanation.

    How 'bout you replace it yourself? Because you posted as a registered user (most desirable, IMHO), you can go back and edit your post. However, please be sure the edits are readily apparent via  <strike> ... </strike> or  <del> ... </del><ins> ... </ins> tags, or an "Update: ..." paragraph or paragraphs added at the end of the post — or both! Uncited changes to a post just make the replies of other monks seem incoherent. Please see Markup in the Monastery, Writeup Formatting Tips, etc.