Re^3: Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters?

Nice detective work there. Just the sort of thing that's probably bitten me in the past except I never did figure out the cause. Well solved.

Comment on Re^3: Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters? by Jim (Curate) on Aug 09, 2014 at 00:56 UTC
Nice detective work there. … Well solved. Well, together, we've solved the riddle of why the damage-repair cycle doesn't round-trip the way we'd expect it to do. But we haven't yet solved my real problem of how to repair the damaged characters. I'm back to the drawing board.	[reply]
Re^5: Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters? by Bethany (Scribe) on Aug 09, 2014 at 03:12 UTC
True. I'm sure some monk or other will have ideas better than my vague "that looks odd". :-}	[reply]