in reply to Re^2: Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters?
in thread Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters?
I am so slow to understand the situation...
I thought proper byte conversion from UTF-8 to cp1252 will solve the whole problem(between 1 and 2 of the
pipeline).
But the wrongly encoded text is already there in the wilderness, and no way back, right?
Then I have no good idea...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Why does Encode::Repair only correctly fix one of these two tandem characters?
by Jim (Curate) on Aug 11, 2014 at 02:26 UTC |