in reply to Re^4: Count in intervals -- PM policy
in thread Count in intervals

Good help is hard to come by, especially when improper considerations are provided. Also, GIGO.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Count in intervals -- PM policy
by ww (Archbishop) on Oct 01, 2014 at 16:54 UTC

    Perhaps you would like to explain the relevance of a link to the OP that's labeled "improper considerations" ...or is this mere spew?

    Please say what you mean.

    I know, I know. Don't feed the trolls... but I do really wonder about the link (and only a little less so, about the other two clauses. Of course, we'll never know if the same Anonymonk made the subject noder or any particular reply.