Re^2: Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks.

The OP is actually opening and closing the code blocks several times in his post

Huh! S'funny, but I assumed that must be the case the 2 or 3 times I've seen this before, but when I was this post was the OPs first and only post, I thought it unlikely that he would have yet discovered readmores yet, hence my post.

It's a weird thing to do -- put some bits in readmores and some not -- but I guess if that's what the OP wants, he should be allowed to do so.

Of course, it makes downloaded and running his code a pain, which will probably discourage anyone from trying to help him...

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^2: Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks. by davido (Cardinal) on Oct 30, 2014 at 21:03 UTC
I agree on all counts. I might have been suspicious of the cause had I not been able to inspect it as a janitor. In fact, I had already done that before reading this thread, because I was confused about how I should be evaluating the code. OP chose strange formatting. It makes it hard for people to see the code as one contiguous element. A Janitor could fix it, but would have to make decisions that are best made by the OP. If the OP doesn't resolve them, someone could send him or her a friendly message mentioning the issue. If it were anonymously posted I'd jump right in and fix it because AM can't fix his own posts. Since it was posted from a real account, I prefer to let the OP do the right thing, and step in for the really bad issues. The title isn't great either. It's not an Inline-based leak. It's a user-created leak based on his manipulation of perlguts/perlcall/perlapi. Inline just processed the code. Dave	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks.
by davido (Cardinal) on Oct 30, 2014 at 21:03 UTC

I agree on all counts. I might have been suspicious of the cause had I not been able to inspect it as a janitor. In fact, I had already done that before reading this thread, because I was confused about how I should be evaluating the code.

OP chose strange formatting. It makes it hard for people to see the code as one contiguous element. A Janitor could fix it, but would have to make decisions that are best made by the OP. If the OP doesn't resolve them, someone could send him or her a friendly message mentioning the issue.

If it were anonymously posted I'd jump right in and fix it because AM can't fix his own posts. Since it was posted from a real account, I prefer to let the OP do the right thing, and step in for the really bad issues.

The title isn't great either. It's not an Inline-based leak. It's a user-created leak based on his manipulation of perlguts/perlcall/perlapi. Inline just processed the code.

Dave

[reply]