in reply to Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks.

um, yeah, this is not a bug, there is a "download code" link at the bottom of the post that shows all the code sections in one download

I've done this before, where some parts are in readmore and others aren't, to hilight certain parts ...

This stuff shouldn't be edited, there is a "download code" corresponding to every node that downloads all the code links, not just part1/part2/part3...

  • Comment on Re: Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Single code block split into multiple sequential code blocks.
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 31, 2014 at 01:47 UTC

    Yeah! The trouble with that is that you also pick up any other, unrelated code blocks in the post (eg. the fifth code block in the target post_ and then have to manually pick out the bit(s) you need. Doable, but still inconvenient and apt to dissuade responders.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
      Hi, I am the OP of the Inline C question (my first post here). :)
      The guidelines recommend hiding less important parts of a posting if it is several screens long.
      I was trying to hide the code that wasn't essential, while still providing functioning code.
      The fact that it broke it into separate colored code chunks like that wasn't what I had hoped for.
      I removed the readmore tags for better clarity.
      Thanks for your help