Re^2: install fails for Inline::C

I would say I had a similar problem, but I read the logs and it turns out I had the exact same problems, without local::lib, it made no difference with or without it. The Inline::C failure was hidden from me just as the previous user and I had to get the test results manually, and of course they were different from the supposed 'summary'. Is there some sort of setting to force the test harness to output ALL the information about the running tests?

Comment on Re^2: install fails for Inline::C

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: install fails for Inline::C by davido (Cardinal) on Dec 04, 2014 at 17:21 UTC
It's unlikely that you would have the same exact failures as what someone else was experiencing six months ago. Inline and Inline::C have undergone a lot of revisions since then, including splitting them into separate distributions. Do this: Clone https://github.com/ingydotnet/inline-pm.git and https://github.com/ingydotnet/inline-c-pm.git, each into their own folders, and run `make test`. This will spit out a more verbose log of test passes/fails. Try this for each of Inline and Inline::C. That should give you a better idea of what is wrong. Feel free to drop by irc.perl.org#inline to discuss issues, or open a GitHub issue. Dave	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: install fails for Inline::C
by davido (Cardinal) on Dec 04, 2014 at 17:21 UTC

It's unlikely that you would have the same exact failures as what someone else was experiencing six months ago. Inline and Inline::C have undergone a lot of revisions since then, including splitting them into separate distributions.

Do this: Clone https://github.com/ingydotnet/inline-pm.git and https://github.com/ingydotnet/inline-c-pm.git, each into their own folders, and run make test. This will spit out a more verbose log of test passes/fails. Try this for each of Inline and Inline::C. That should give you a better idea of what is wrong. Feel free to drop by irc.perl.org#inline to discuss issues, or open a GitHub issue.

Dave

[reply]
[d/l]