Re^4: perltidy for ternary operator?

I didn't ask how to achieve what the majority want, I asked how to achieve what I want.

As Occam said: Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.

Comment on Re^4: perltidy for ternary operator?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: perltidy for ternary operator? by atcroft (Abbot) on Dec 07, 2014 at 04:51 UTC
Could one not just create a second ternary operation that perl would optimize out, such as the following? Read more... (76 Bytes) According to B:Deparse, the second ternary operator appears to be optimized out: Read more... (464 Bytes) However, the code, when handled by Perl::Tidy, appears to be formatted in the manner the OP is requesting: Read more... (629 Bytes) I know that may not be what the OP was hoping for, but perhaps it might be an option to look at. Hope that helps.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: perltidy for ternary operator? by LanX (Saint) on Dec 06, 2014 at 22:24 UTC
And you got an answer: patch the code. There is no option for your private needs Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}	[reply]