Re^10: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

Is a dev deployment a possibility? Even one without user accounts and posts—just the stored code—would be fine.

Update: I don't think the second half/answer was there when I started to reply. So the question is probably moot. :P

Comment on Re^10: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real by jdporter (Paladin) on May 20, 2019 at 14:44 UTC
It should be. Someone ;-) should investigate. I feel like it's been done before... Note to self: The only user installed by any extant nodeballs was 113. Users 112 and 111 were not, afaict. (The only other NPC users after 113 were 519 and 827, and they were not installed from nodeballs either.) The significance of this is that, if we do create a "safe" copy of the nodebase, we can probably safely delete all users except root. I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^11: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real
by jdporter (Paladin) on May 20, 2019 at 14:44 UTC

It should be. Someone ;-) should investigate. I feel like it's been done before...

The only user installed by any extant nodeballs was 113. Users 112 and 111 were not, afaict.

(The only other NPC users after 113 were 519 and 827, and they were not installed from nodeballs either.)

The significance of this is that, if we do create a "safe" copy of the nodebase, we can probably safely delete all users except root.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.