|
Re^2: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts?
by marto (Cardinal) on May 22, 2019 at 14:54 UTC
|
I think there's a difference in contributing to the site as a user and managing the site, in terms of code/systems or policy. I don't think it's fair to equate the two. I doubt BrowserUK treats the XP system seriously, and IIRC has even pointed out flaws in doing so.
| [reply] |
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |
Re^2: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 22, 2019 at 19:40 UTC
|
I am a user here, nothing more. I have no admin privileges here, and never have had.
I'd offer you some vinegar with those chips; but you seem sour enough already.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Suck that fhit
| [reply] |
Re^2: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts?
by trippledubs (Deacon) on May 22, 2019 at 15:18 UTC
|
how do you know responsibility was declined or are you making not volunteering equivalent? XP is the measure of all things, everyone knows | [reply] |
|
|
What I am saying is, if there is an issue with "right to be forgotten" laws, surely that issue is the responsibility of all the Monks, who have built this Monastery and to whom it belongs. At least, the most senior Monk could have raised it as a group discussion rather than asking what some fairy godmother "Management" is going to do about it.
The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
| [reply] |
|
|
In fact, when I raised the issue in Proposed EU law: right to be forgotten, BrowserUK contributed - I thought helpfully - to the discussion. S/he is NOT the "most senior monk". If such an individual exists, it's Tim Vroom. Even if s/he were, why would there be any duty to raise any subject?
Regards,
John Davies
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
If I had any influence here, this place would be quite different...But it is, and always has been, cliquocratic; and I don't fit.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Suck that fhit
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
|
|
|
|
|
|