Re^2: Multi-stage flip-flop?

Can a "bare" regex be used like that? I would have thought it would need quoting.

So maybe:

till (
  qr/match0/ => \&doOtherProcessing,
  qr/match1/ => \&doStage1,
)
[download]

Comment on Re^2: Multi-stage flip-flop? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Multi-stage flip-flop? by LanX (Saint) on Dec 11, 2014 at 17:08 UTC
That's completely different, `qr//` returns a regex and not the result of a boolean test. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Multi-stage flip-flop? by RonW (Parson) on Dec 11, 2014 at 17:23 UTC
How else would `till` control which condition got evaluated? If `till` were actually built in to Perl, it could control control evaluation. But, if it was built in, then it could impose scalar context on the conditions with out needing the - in front.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Multi-stage flip-flop? by LanX (Saint) on Dec 11, 2014 at 18:46 UTC
It doesn't need to know the condition just the result by position. I'll post some proof of concept later... Asking for built-ins is an illusion... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}	[reply]
Re^6: Multi-stage flip-flop? by RonW (Parson) on Dec 11, 2014 at 20:00 UTC