Re^4: open(), go away with bad way, or fail with the right way?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: open(), go away with bad way, or fail with the right way? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jun 01, 2019 at 18:15 UTC
"...only a demo..." Even (or especially) a demo should compile without warnings. And masked variables may lead to pain in the ass (old saying). "...read the thread..." I have read the thread. Best regards, Karl «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe» `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: open(), go away with bad way, or fail with the right way? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 01, 2019 at 20:16 UTC
No, I do not* defend this as a coding practice -- I'm just trying to elucidate how Perl works.*	[reply]
Re^7: open(), go away with bad way, or fail with the right way? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jun 01, 2019 at 23:11 UTC
“...elucidate...“ Sure, I know. But probably even Perl has a dark side? «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe» `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: open(), go away with bad way, or fail with the right way? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 02, 2019 at 02:31 UTC
Re^9: open(), go away with bad way, or fail with the right way? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jun 02, 2019 at 18:25 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here