Re^6: shift on empty array in list context broken

The statement is still false even if it's surrounded by true ones.

Except that its not false even a little

equivalence
    n 1: a state of being essentially equal or equivalent;
[download]

Comment on Re^6: shift on empty array in list context broken Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: shift on empty array in list context broken by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jul 19, 2019 at 08:06 UTC
And `shift(@a)` is equivalent to `splice(@a,0,1)` —they can have evaluate to completely different values— making the statement false. Returning a single undefined scalar is different than returning none at all.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^8: shift on empty array in list context broken by LanX (Saint) on Jul 19, 2019 at 22:03 UTC
Better stop feeding, this person is just repeating unfunded claims. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^9: shift on empty array in list context broken by Anonymous Monk on Jul 23, 2019 at 16:16 UTC
Quoting from docs n dictionary is trolling? Wow	[reply]
Re^10: shift on empty array in list context broken by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jul 26, 2019 at 03:33 UTC