in reply to Re^2: Missing error under strict (Perlbug: postfix 'until' has inconsistent scope)
in thread Missing error under strict

state is a much higher level of headaches and AFAIR not reliable.

the ... until XXX $var = "x" with XXX a possible declaration is always executed.

It just happens that $var is reset afterwards.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

  • Comment on Re^3: Missing error under strict (Perlbug: postfix 'until' has inconsistent scope)
  • Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Missing error under strict (Perlbug: postfix 'until' has inconsistent scope)
by Don Coyote (Hermit) on Jul 23, 2019 at 14:53 UTC

    I think I see the issue now

    Basically my and state should be in the same scope, but state just holds value through iterations. So the my declaration should hold after the until modifer is executed, as it does with the state declaration.

    I'm kind of wondering if 'our' gets restricted to what 'my' should do by this behaviour

    First time I thought of using our to declare lexicality while using the same variable more than once in an expression.

      Our works as expected, which is another argument for my theory that the loop's "scope" is falsely cleaned.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice