I'm not sure what is being requested in this comment. Get rid of the post? The module? That wording? Some concept expressed in the post? Some goal for the module?

I would appreciate feedback that is clear and actionable, and that comes in the spirit of patient, constructive criticism.

We can arrange for approximately equial... ,P.

The quote is the beginning of some kind of infomercial type justification for writing parent::versioned, you dont need it

ALso, name seems a tad long, parent::v or parent::mv ...

Fair enough on the wording. I've trimmed the post down a bit. Unfortunately that might make these comments seem out of context, but you're right, less is more.

As for the module name, I agree it's longer than I would prefer, but it's a name that describes its purpose better than ::v or ::mv, or any other name I could come up with as I was working on it. I could let the parent::versioned distribution provide parent::v, for those who wish to save some keystrokes. I'll keep the thought opened to see if any consensus arrives.




Dave