in reply to Re^3: reap, troll-feeding of reaped troll
in thread reap, troll-feeding of reaped troll

I'll say it again: Trolling, at least if it's egregious enough, is reason for reaping. Troll-feeding is not.

What is egregious enough? What yesterday was "troll-feeding" is "trolling" today

  • Comment on Re^4: reap, troll-feeding of reaped troll

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: reap, troll-feeding of reaped troll
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 06, 2019 at 12:36 UTC
    “Some say that Socrates was a troll”

    Has some interesting ideas.

    I prefer only to reap if it includes rude insults or its damaging the community. Mostly both.

    But too much reaping is also damaging the community!

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

    update

    removed footnote

      I prefer only to reap if it includes rude insults or its damaging the community. Mostly both.

      What are "rude" insults?

      What is damaging the community?

      Since when are those valid reasons ?

      But too much reaping is also damaging the community!

      I dont even know what to say to that contradiction

        > What are "rude" insults?

        Infuriating things, degradation.

        > What is damaging the community?

        Things which are damaging members and driving them away.

        The definition of a troll is an outsider who enjoys to destroy a group.

        Especially anonymous monks which are hiding.

        We discussed this already.

        So if you want better protection log in.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice