in reply to Re: A question of fork efficiency
in thread A question of fork efficiency
Thanks for the input tybalt89! I tested the version I had against the version you wrote on 7052 servers using time. The version I had performed better even after I added the timeout back into your version.
My Version:
real 1m6.522s user 0m59.375s sys 1m5.178s
Your Version:
^C real 3m10.862s user 0m0.685s sys 0m0.507s
I'm not familiar enough with it. And note some of the servers in my list may no longer exist so it may have been hung up on some?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: A question of fork efficiency
by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Aug 06, 2019 at 19:51 UTC | |
by trippledubs (Deacon) on Aug 07, 2019 at 13:02 UTC | |
by holli (Abbot) on Aug 07, 2019 at 13:57 UTC | |
by synless (Acolyte) on Aug 07, 2019 at 14:43 UTC | |
by synless (Acolyte) on Aug 07, 2019 at 13:23 UTC | |
by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Aug 07, 2019 at 15:40 UTC | |
by synless (Acolyte) on Aug 08, 2019 at 16:04 UTC | |
by synless (Acolyte) on Aug 07, 2019 at 14:49 UTC | |
by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Aug 07, 2019 at 15:20 UTC | |
by synless (Acolyte) on Aug 07, 2019 at 18:03 UTC | |
by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Aug 07, 2019 at 18:18 UTC | |
by synless (Acolyte) on Aug 07, 2019 at 15:58 UTC |