in reply to Re^2: Last best chance to rename "Perl6" ?
in thread Last best chance to rename "Perl6" ?

How about frtn? That represents the number of years since announce to the first release becoming available. That said, perhaps the Fortran folk might get a bit pissed :)

Meh, just making fun of a convoluted situation. Personally, I have no investment either way. I've dabbled with perl6 here and there a bit, but not to the point I've created anything of value with it. In other words, I don't mind observing questions on the topic, but at this time, I'm too busy to delve any further into it.

I did notice when I have played with it that the start up time was abysmal (relative to perl5). I write a lot of software that is very long running, which makes startup time irrelevant. However, most Perl users/writers I know are wanting/writing scripts that don't loop forever and simply perform a few tasks which demand quick start up time. Has the VM layer startup time been improved?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Last best chance to rename "Perl6" ?
by haukex (Archbishop) on Aug 13, 2019 at 19:05 UTC
Re^4: Last best chance to rename "Perl6" ?
by daxim (Curate) on Aug 14, 2019 at 09:19 UTC
    start up time was abysmal
    Does it really meaningfully impact one's productivity when it's 340ms (cold)/150ms (warm) instead of 30ms (cold)/10ms (warm)? (About the same as three years ago.) Mind you, the comparison becomes more fair once you also load Moose, Perl6::Junctions and many more that you get for free.
    › time echo -n | perl6 real 0m0,339s user 0m0,222s sys 0m0,058s › time echo -n | perl6 real 0m0,124s user 0m0,151s sys 0m0,027s › time echo -n | perl6 real 0m0,122s user 0m0,142s sys 0m0,034s › time echo -n | perl6 real 0m0,123s user 0m0,140s sys 0m0,038s › time echo -n | perl6 real 0m0,124s user 0m0,147s sys 0m0,031s › time echo -n | perl6 real 0m0,123s user 0m0,140s sys 0m0,035s