Re^7: About using rperl

If rperl is just a layer on top of Inline::CPP, then what is the advantage over patching B::Deparse to convert Perl Snippets to CPP?

For instance code like the following

sub func :cpp int {
  my int ($a,$b) = @_;
  return $a+$b
}
[download]

is (after predefining :cpp and int) legal perl5 syntax and B::Deparse gets all necessary details.

sub func {
    (my int ($a, $b)) = @_;
    return $a + $b;
}
use attributes ('main', sub {
    (my int ($a, $b)) = @_;
    return $a + $b;
}
, 'cpp', 'int');
[download]

So whats the extra value of rperl?

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}

Comment on Re^7: About using rperl Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: About using rperl by Anonymous Monk on Aug 15, 2019 at 18:47 UTC
If rperl is just a layer on top of Inline::CPP, then what is the advantage over patching B::Deparse to convert Perl Snippets to CPP? ...So whats the extra value of rperl? You tell me? Is it not clear? I mean you must have at this point read everything there is to read about RPerl, the faq , docs , benchmarks / examples , jokes / original discussions about creating rperl... Old clues https://metacpan.org/source/RURBAN/B-C-1.57/ramblings/rperl.md	[reply]
Re^9: About using rperl (updated) by LanX (Saint) on Aug 15, 2019 at 19:09 UTC
Thanks for the link. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice} update > Is it not clear? no	[reply]

update