in reply to Re: Are the words "strict" and "warnings" too negative?
in thread Are the words "strict" and "warnings" too negative?

... a nice happy pragma ...

Like   useModern::Perl;   maybe??? (We're already using perl :)

Update: dict.org sez Moby Thesaurus sez use is synonymous with "abuse", "bad habit", "bleed", "bleed white", "exploit", "impose", "impose upon", "ravages of time", "ritual", "stereotype", "use ill", so maybe we need to adopt a synonym for use; "include" is nice and positive. :)

Give a man a fish:  <%-{-{-{-<

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Are the words "strict" and "warnings" too negative?
by LanX (Saint) on Sep 04, 2019 at 07:21 UTC
    > use is synonymous with "abuse"

    I'd like to alias abuse to use ...

    The new keyword would make the code of some colleagues much clearer.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Meditations