Re^3: Returning arrays from a package

Not always true. And the OP is working on a class, and it's likely s/he will want to do more with the numbers. So rather than suggest regressing in functionality, I went with his/her architecture. :-/

The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Comment on Re^3: Returning arrays from a package Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Returning arrays from a package by Anonymous Monk on Oct 04, 2019 at 01:42 UTC
Not always true. :) Sure its always true. People just think that sometimes its not but it always is :) by definition And the OP is working on a class, and it's likely s/he will want to do more with the numbers. So rather than suggest regressing in functionality, I went with his/her architecture. :-/ Mooo! Mooo! Mooo! Your Data has no Model and no View Needs no instances to exist, therefore needs no classes to instantiate instances of OP has no moo, no bless, no class, ... OPs architecture is plain data	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Returning arrays from a package
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 04, 2019 at 01:42 UTC

Not always true.

:) Sure its always true. People just think that sometimes its not but it always is :) by definition

And the OP is working on a class, and it's likely s/he will want to do more with the numbers. So rather than suggest regressing in functionality, I went with his/her architecture. :-/

Mooo! Mooo! Mooo!

Your Data has no Model and no View

Needs no instances to exist, therefore needs no classes to instantiate instances of

OP has no moo, no bless, no class, ... OPs architecture is plain data

[reply]